Reasons not to make use Of Google > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

To avoid main different individuals astray, please do not confer with movies utilizing the host title youtube.com or its aliases. Instead, make a link to invidio.us or one of the related proxy websites. Lead people to what is sweet, not to what's dangerous! Just ensure that not to choose a proxy that's "protected" by Cloudflare, since that sends its own nonfree software program. This way of referring might be fail-secure: it might cease to work, but it's going to probably not start main individuals to run nonfree software program. There can also be a Firefox add-on to bypass that Javascript code. IceCat comes with that add-on by default. But that won't overcome the blockage of entry by way of Tor. If Google defeats the invidio.us proxies, I can ell you the way I cannot respond. I will not surrender to youtube's nonfree software and surveillance. I get pleasure from having access to the music and video there, but I will not do foolish or determined things to keep that entry. You should not both! You don't need a particular "platform" to publish an audio or video on the web. You can post an audio or video file on any net site. Just put the file on the location and link to it as if it were an bizarre page. All graphical browsers can handle that.Google censored set up of Samsung's advert-blocker, saying that blocking ads is "interference" with the sites that publicize (and surveil users by way of adverts). The ad-blocker is proprietary software, identical to the program (Google Play) that Google used to deny entry to install it. I might refuse to have both of them on my pc. Using a nonfree program gives the proprietor energy over you, and Google has exercised that power.

Surveillance

To determine your self to a Google service is a grave error. - Google shops a listing of all purchases a user has made that in any means mention the consumer's a gmail account. A consumer can delete purchases from this record, but only one buy at a time. Then that purchase disappears from the listing that the person sees. Whether it stays in another listing, we have no idea, but I'd expect Google to answer that question with doubletalk. The article talks about what Google cites as its motive for doing this, but the motive is irrelevant - because it is not an excuse.- Google's alarm system, "Nest Secure", seems to have contained a microphone all along - but only not too long ago started listening.- Google "sanitizes" its total search logs, then publishes them; nevertheless it declines to explain the strategy of "sanitization", and there is proof that users may be tracked through them.

The article also mentions two-factor authentication, which in and of itself could be a helpful approach (though I've learn that crackers can now defeat it), but has the flaw of requiring a cell phone. My rule #2 for digital safety is not to have a mobile phone.

- Gmail was deliberate from the start as a massive surveillance system, to make psychological profiles not only of Gmail customers however of everybody who sends mail to Gmail users.- Google quietly combined its advert-monitoring profiles with its searching profiles.- Google has found a approach to trace most bank card purchases in the US, even those not achieved through a phone, and correlate that with individuals's online actions.

Google cannot do either facet to me, since I pay money and do not carry a cell phone, and it would not know what web pages I look at.

- Google Play sends app builders the private particulars of users that set up the app. Merely asking customers' "consent" for this isn't sufficient to legitimize that. We know that most customers have given up on studying simply what they're "consenting" to, and the reason being that they're accustomed to being instructed, "If you'd like to use this service, you must consent to blah blah blah." To really protect people's privateness, we must cease Google (and different companies) from getting this personal info in the first place!- Google shops a huge amount of information on every user. This can embrace, in addition to the consumer's search historical past and promoting profile: - A timeline of the person's location throughout each day- Data on the utilization of non-Google phone apps- 'Deleted' emails and information uploaded to Google Drive

Facebook and Google joined with ISPs to defeat a privateness initiative in California. Collecting the many ways Google is involved with US government surveillance, abroad and in the US, amounts to quite a package.

Google invitations individuals to let Google monitor their phone use, and all internet use in their homes, for an extravagant payment of $20.

This malicious functionality is not a secondary aspect of a program with another goal; this is the software program's sole purpose, and Google says so. But Google says it in a approach that encourages most individuals to ignore the main points and stay unaware of the extent of the spying. Anyway, mere consent doesn't legitimize huge surveillance.

Amazon and Google need "good" devices to report all exercise to them.

In other phrases, when you've got a "sensible" (read "spy") lightbulb with that proposed feature, and inform an Amazon or Google listening device about it, thenceforth any time you switched it on or off irrespective of how, it would ship a report to Amazon or Google.

Even as we speak, the one solution to make "sensible" merchandise safe is to make sure they cannot connect with anyone else's techniques.

Another piece of Google's surveillance capitalism: when shops mail receipts to a gmail.com account, Google figures out and records who purchased what.

I feel that the store itself should not get this information, https://x-fetish.tube which is why I all the time pay cash and by no means give my identify.

*Google faces lawsuit over tracking in apps even when customers opted out.*

Terms of Service

- Google cuts off accounts for users that resell Pixel telephones. They lose entry to all of their mail and paperwork saved in Google servers underneath that account. It needs to be illegal to place any "terms of service" on a bodily product. It should even be unlawful to shut an account on a service with out letting the person download whatever was stored there. These occasions provide another motive why colleges must never ask a scholar to use a service account linked to the student's identify.

Censorship

- Amazon and Google have reduce off domain-fronting, a characteristic used to enable people in tyrannical international locations to reach communication systems which might be banned there.- French blogger Claims YouTube Tried to Censor Juncker Interview.- Google has agreed to carry out particular censorship of Youtube for the government of Pakistan, deleting views that the state opposes. This may assist the illiberal Pakistani state suppress dissent.

- Youtube's "content ID" automatically deletes posted movies in a approach copyright legislation does not require.- YouTube has made personal deals with the copyright trade to censor works which are fair use. More data.

- Google shut off Alexa O'Brien's Google Drive account, denying her access to it, because her reporting on Chelsea Manning's trial included copies of al-Qa'ida propaganda that was offered as proof.- Google is deleting porn artists' porn videos from their own personal accounts, quietly and mysteriously.

Never trust a remote storage company to maintain anything however a spare backup copy. Whenever you store that, put your files into an archive and encrypt it so that the company cannot tell what's in them - not even their file names.

- Vox legal professionals bought Youtube to take down criticisms of a video revealed by Vox, and threaten the critics with punishment, too.

The movies had been nearly absolutely truthful use, but Youtube decided towards the critics anyway. This reveals how Youtube's general submission to the copyright industry constrict's people's rights.

Miscellaneous

- Google is a tax dodger. Of course, it's not the just one, however that isn't any excuse.- Google supports the TPP because of three mostly-evil provisions that would profit Google.- Google has made it in order that Chrome now mechanically installs the DRM module. This makes it harmful for safety researchers in the US to analyze doable insecurity in Chrome. More data.- Support is growing for reverting US antitrust legislation to what it was before Reagan weakened it. That is why Google is using its influence to weaken those that marketing campaign against this.

How I Got Fired From a D.C. Think Tank for Fighting Against the facility of Google.

- Google advised a reporter in 2011 that internet sites without "+1" buttons could be punished with lower search rankings. When she revealed a narrative in Forbes about that, Google pressured Forbes to take it down.